Home

Advertisement

Customize
Kevin Williams
04 March 2009 @ 11:57 pm

I've just gotten back from watching a movie I'd been highly anticipating.
"Watchmen" has been on my list of things to see ever since I found out it was being made. I loved the graphic novel, and regrettably, the movie does not live up to it. Not even close. To anyone who disagrees with my assessment, good on you. Everyone has different standards and I suppose there is some comfort that some could enjoy the movie while I could not.

To those interested, here are a bunch of nitpicks that ruined it for me (more egregious plot-revelations are cut to avoid spoiling too much for those that still want to see it):

The acting is somewhat unconvincing and wooden, with a possible exception of Dr. Manhattan, who didn't appear wooden enough. I also didn't like how some of the characters are portrayed:

  • Dan Dreiberg wasn't old enough. And this is why )
  • Edward Blake was way too old. I really mean this. )
  • Dr. Manhattan's voice wasn't deep enough for my taste.
  • Rorschach's voice... it doesn't change to reflect the differences between his "normal" tone of voice and his "rorschach" tone of voice (something I was looking forward to hearing).
  • I didn't sympathize with movie Adrian at all, since some of his redeeming features have been removed completely. And this is why )
  • A number of characters are missing despite their impact on the main plot. And I miss them... )
I had a couple problems with how the plot developed as well:
  • The Big Conspiracy is different from the book. )
  • Important plotlines feel hollow, because there hasn't been enough time devoted to fleshing them out. Hollow as in empty. )
  • Two of my favorite pieces of dialog from the book were cut or butchered, but the scenes are there, so I can be certain this won't be remedied in an extended edition. And these are the scenes... )
  • Apart from the plotlines feeling hollow, the whole fleshed out world and culture is largely limited to the opening credits and Hollis talking to Dan in their beer session.
  • Most irritatingly, time that could have been devoted to these was used for (in my opinion) irrelevant scenes. You may disagree with my assessment of irrelevant... )
  • The movie is excessively violent. This is under the consideration that the book isn't excessively violent (and it certainly isn't made for children). Click here to read about violence )
  • The New Frontiersman doesn't appear until the end.
  • The Police Strike Riots get largely glossed over. The Keene act is merely mentioned in passing.

So, again, I'll say this is my opinion, influenced by how I interpreted the graphic novel when I read it. I was terribly disappointed by the movie, and while I can admit I may have judged it too harshly, I've left a number of things that bothered me while watching it out of this analysis, because in retrospect, they were appropriate for the adaptation from picture to motion picture. Also, not everything about the movie was bad. The effects and action scenes weren't bad, Dr. Manhattan's "aura" comes across nicely, and unlike in the book, the American flag in the cemetary scene gets folded correctly.

 
 
Kevin Williams
03 October 2008 @ 01:13 pm

 
 
Kevin Williams
21 June 2008 @ 10:54 am

I must admit, I didn't expect the fight that the German team put up against Portugal. Secretly, I hoped they wouldn't play as amateurish as they had during the opening round, but in my heart, I was preparing myself for seeing my team kicked out of the Cup. And then they won! =D

So, yeah, I finished a Euro Cup game plan a few days ago and the lil' German with his pickelhaube has advanced to the Semi-finals:

 
 
Kevin Williams
29 May 2008 @ 06:32 pm
So, my presentation is done, and I shall now reveal what the map and the oil barrels were meant to do:

There are two countries. Persecutestand is the purple one and Oppressionland the green one:



Both countries are pretty much the only oil exporting countries in the region, meaning they dictate the oil supply. Together. Both countries are equally important in determining supply. If less oil is produced, it can be sold for a higher price and vice versa. Therefore, both countries have an incentive to produce less, since they'll earn more profit per barrel. Conversely, they'll earn less if both produce more oil, as they can charge less per barrel. However, the best situation for any country is if they produce more and the other produces less, since they'll be able to sell a lot of oil for a moderate price, making more money than they would selling a lot of oil for a low price or a little oil for a high price. Course that really sucks for the country that produced less oil, because they get less money than if they sold a lot of oil for a low price.

This relationship can be represented in the following graph:



Now, we assume that neither country will act in a manner that is detrimental to its self-interest (in this case making money). So both countries will try to maximize their profits. But in doing so, they reduce their profits! By cooperating, and acting against their individual self interest, they're actually better off! That is the subtle beauty of the prisoners' dilemma.
 
 
Kevin Williams
20 May 2008 @ 07:33 pm
Economics, I've discovered, are usually quite boring. Except Game Theory and the Prisoners' Dilemma. Which is why I'm so glad I lucked out and drew the winning number that won me a presentation on exactly that (as opposed to having to write a ten page essay). So here's a thing or two that I'm going to put into that presentation to bring the gospel of Game Theory to the masses:

Photobucket
A barrel of oil!

Photobucket
A map!

But what does this have to do with prisoners?
I may or may not explain after I'm done.
 
 
Kevin Williams
11 May 2008 @ 11:23 pm
I finally got around to seeing. Well worth the ticket price, I must say (type), but considering the hype it's been receiving from the places I frequent, I was a bit disappointed. It didn't really blow me away any more than the Spiderman movies did, which is probably the next best comparison. I did enjoy it and I did sit through to the end of the credits, despite the underflavored soft drink (they ran out of syrup at the drinks vendors) weighing heavily on my bladder. Then again, I do this for any movie. Speaking of which, don't be a nimwit: Watch Ironman to the end.

Anyway, to return to the issue of why I only enjoyed the movie as opposed to thoroughly enjoying it, I've managed to pinpoint it to one major reason: The portrayal of violence in the movie. I don't know why (honestly, I don't. I watched John Rambo without this happening) but for some reason whenever Stark smashed one of his unprotected adversaries with his metal fists, I couldn't really shake the thought "He just pulverized his bones. That's horrible." Or the way he shot the Ten Rings stooges in the head to save the hostages. Maybe the bad guys didn't commit enough atrocities on screen to evoke my moral outrage, or Stark just seemed too nice a guy to pull that off. 

But that didn't ruin the movie.

The other funny thing that happened was that I ran into a former classmate of mine (while buying fizzy water that both the cashier and I thought was a Seven Up). Only she was off to see a different movie. And I didn't run into my dad, which is surprising as he went to the same showing and sat a few rows back from where I was.
 
 
Kevin Williams
06 May 2008 @ 11:05 am
So there's an awkward teen meme going on. Why not participate?

16to23-1.png picture by ulteriormotives

Had to squish it to fit it, so the full-sized image is here (and the text is actually legible).
 
 
Kevin Williams
24 April 2008 @ 01:45 pm
I've been thinking about what to do with this journal. My prime motivation of joining LJ was for the WeeklyWhatever run by people from a forum I frequent, and I haven't really got much other reason to post anything. This isn't my first webbased journal; I had a Xanga account a while back. I grew tired of it, and there were a couple personal reasons that convinced me to stop posting details of my life. So I've no real interest in pouring my heart out into a publicly viewable space. But on the other hand, I don't want this journal going to waste, so I've been contemplating what I can do with it.

Foremost, linking it to my webcomic may be a good idea. Unfortunately, I lack a computer of my own. Apart from losing the power to work on comics independently of Uni Library opening hours, I'm also prevented from using Photoshop and installing more pleasing fonts. This makes working on my comic in the form I currently have it impossible, and the alternatives means of continuing Scabfields do not do that style justice in a manner that I'd be willing to settle for. So, if I were to make this my comic commentary journal, I'd have to hiatus it as well, to reflect the current inactivity of my comic.

The other option I've been toying with is to make it a sketchpad journal, somewhat of a hybrid between an art (or sketch gallery) and a journal. I'd end up posting pretty much whatever I felt like doing at the time, either an irregular musing of my life in general or something I've drawn that I'm particularly pleased with. The nice thing about that is that I could always link it up to my comic once I can return to updating.

But I'm still largely undecided.
 
 
Kevin Williams
21 April 2008 @ 09:28 pm
And here it is. I've not much to say, save that that's the first time that spiffy new avatar appears online. More to come later.
 
 
 
 

Advertisement

Customize